NACHRI Facilities Design 2009 closes with a presentation from Judene Bartley, vice president of Epidemiology Consulting Services, Inc., and John Reiling, Ph.D., president and CEO of Safe by Design.
Bartley starts with the presumption that it is possible to reduce hospital acquired infection rates, but it is very hard to quantify what changes affect what outcome improvements. Precise controlling of variables is difficult in the ever-changing health care environment. Particularly in pediatrics, creating a static environment is impossible.
Facllities design and contruction is a major contributor to reducing hospital acquired infections. A well-designed environment helps eliminate medication errors, transmittion of drug-resistant organisms and other infections.
An HVAC system that provides clean air and proper flow can expedite healing and reduce infections. In addition, air direction and speed and a well-sealed environment all affect the healing process. Using the right surfaces also has a huge impact on creating a clean environment.
Hospital realities
Reiling shares about his father dying last year from a hospital acquired infection that was supposed to help address his chronic leukemia. The statistics are staggering: every 22 admits in adult hospitals, someone gets a hospital acquired infection. One in every 300 dies. In medical/surgical hospitals, one out of every 10 medicines given is wrong.
Reiling's rule, speaking from experience as a former hospital CEO: "Never go to a hospital by yourself -- always take someone else with you. It is much, much safer."
So why all the errors?
We have culture, processes and systems that set people up for failure, and we have facilities that lock in erroneous processes. A competent person in a broken culture and facility will still make mistakes and cause harm.
2002 was the first year that facilities were considered as a potential factor in causing harm.
Design around common errors
When you identify problems and commor errors, think about how your facilities design could address those errors. Don't just design around successes, but design around failures to elminate the odds of details going wrong or being missed by folks who are lazy or in a hurry.
The human factor has to figure into every equation. People will do what is right in front of them, what is most immediate, what is shortest. Think about a place where a sidewalk is counterintuituve, so a dirt path has been worn connecting the shortest distance across a courtyard. Hospital design shares similar principles -- design around intuitive, shortest distance paths and compliance with common sense safety improvements will increase.
Improving outcomes and reducing infection rates are not linked to any one change -- they are linked to a bundle of common-sense improvements that create a culture of safety. It isn't just about evidence based design, but it is about implementing ideas that will lessen the risk of harm.
What have you learned at this conference that you will take back and work to implement at your own hospital?